Legal Opinion

Yarbrough v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 21, 1989No. 032-88PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

Appellant was convicted by jury for the offense of aggravated sexual assault. The jury assessed punishment at ten years con finement in the Texas Department of Corrections.

On direct appeal, the Dallas Court of Appeals affirmed appellant’s conviction, holding that the trial court did not err in failing to include in the charge on punishment the fifteen statutory terms and conditions enumerated in Tex.Code Crim.Pro. Ann. art. 42.12 § 6(a). Yarbrough v. State, 742 S.W.2d 62 (Tex.App. — Dallas 1987). We granted appellant’s petition for…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Yarbrough v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  2. Brass v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

4Cited by45 opinions

  1. Cagle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Wade v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1997
  3. Murdock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. McNamara v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  5. Croft v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API