Legal Opinion

Oberhansly v. Earle

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1977No. 14820PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice:

Before us is a judgment of the District Court. The court held the agreement and actions between the parties were too vague and conflicting to constitute a valid contract. The court awarded plaintiffs the sum of $2,040.93 as equitable relief. Plaintiffs appeal, we affirm. Costs to defendants.

On December 5,1974, defendants, as buyer, and plaintiffs as seller, signed an Earnest Money Receipt and Offer to Purchase Form (hereafter referred to as agreement). For a purchase price of $6,000.00, buyers were to obtain the “distributorship for Schlitz, Miller and Hamms Beer and RC Cola…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Valcarce v. BittersUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  2. B & R SUPPLY COMPANY v. BringhurstUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Bennett v. Robinson's Medical Mart, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Cutler v. BowenUtah Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Winegar v. Froerer Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Atlas Corp. v. Clovis National BankUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Buehner Block Co. v. UWC ASSOCIATESUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. John Call Engineering, Inc. v. Manti City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Nisonger v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API