Legal Opinion

Atlas Insurance v. Robison

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 4, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Bradley Circuit Court; Henry W. Wells, Judge; The policy was void because of the additional insurance. 72 Ark. 306; 100 N. Y. 451; 84 Ark. 186; 69 Ark. 489; 121 S. W. 1046. There is evidence to support the verdict. It should not, therefore, be disturbed on appeal. 84 Ark. 78. The false statements must have been knowingly and wilfully made. 65 Ark. 332; 123 Mass. 280; 106 Ala. 351; 2 May, Ins. 477.

1Opinion of the CourtFrauEnthar, J.

This was an action instituted by the. plaintiff below, P. J. Robison, to recover upon an insurance policy for the loss of and damage to certain personal property caused by fire. On April 8, 1907, the Atlas Insurance Company issued to plaintiff its policy of insurance by which for a term of three years from that date it insured plaintiff against loss or damage by fire on property, consisting of household and kitohen furniture, beds, bedding, etc., in an amount not exceeding $1,300. On October 1, 1908, about 4 o’clock b. svi.; the property was partially destroyed and damaged by fire. A verdict…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Mutual Insurance v. LatouretteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1903
  2. German-American Insurance v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  3. Newton v. RussianSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  4. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. BobackSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1903
  5. Greenwich Insurance v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co. v. CargillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. National Liberty Ins. Co. v. MilliganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  3. American Pioneer Life Insurance v. TurmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API