Legal Opinion

Kirk v. McClendon

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 12, 1923No. 11585PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THOMPSON. 0.

Defendant in error commenced this action in the district court of Atoka county, Okla., by filing bis petit it n .on Hie 13th day of November, 1917. playing for judgment, on tlie promissory-note executed on the 20th day of June, 1914, by plaintiffs in error to the defendant in error and for a foreclosure of a real estate mortgage, given by plaintiffs in ervor as security for the payment of- said note. Summons was issued and returned, showing personal service upon Malinda Kirk and service upon R. A. Kirk “by leaving a copy of the within summons duly certified with Malinda…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re MaasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  2. Norris v. DagleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Aldrich v. BartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re J.N.M.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Hiatt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. State Ex Rel. Sathre v. RobertsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Fleming v. BithellIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Greenwood v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API