Legal Opinion

In re J.N.M.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 14, 1982No. 51761PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMMS, Justice:

Appellants seek to have the order permanently terminating their parental rights to their three children, JNM, STM, and WJM, reversed and remanded. The appeal raises numerous issues regarding the constitutionality of 10 O.S.1981, § 1130; however, because we reverse on the ground of insufficient evidence, we do not need to reach the constitutional questions raised.

The essence of the chronology of events leading to the order terminating the appellant’s parental rights is as follows: the District Court of Woodward County directed the Department of Institutions, Social and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Alsager v. District Court of Polk Cty., IowaDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1975
  4. In Re the Adoption of Darren Todd H.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Davis v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-5209 & No. JS-4963Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. BABY F. v. OKLAHOMA COUNTY DISTRICT COURTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  3. In Re Baby Girl L.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  4. In the Interest of LGSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  5. In Re BTWSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API