Legal Opinion
Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Candler
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 12, 1922No. 6005PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, District Judge.
This was a suit to recover damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff had judgment, and defendant has brought the cause to this court for review.
*882The defendant requested the trial court to give the following instruction :
“If you should conclude to allow plaintiff damages on account of future pain and inconvenience if any, it will be your duty, after determining the amount of plaintiff’s damages for such future pain and inconvenience, to reduce said amount to its present worth and the present worth or value only will be represented in your verdict.”
The court refused to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. PutnamSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Pierce v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HollowaySupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. GaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
3Cited by41 opinions
- Botta v. BrunnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Edward L. Flanigan v. Burlington Northern Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Crum v. WardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
- Braddock v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1955
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.