Legal Opinion

Brown v. State Ex Rel. Merland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1929No. 21539PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.

The demurrer is general and

challenges the sufficiency of the answer as a defense. In argument two grounds are urged: First, that the statutes in question are of a general nature and do not have uniform operation throughout the state, in violation of Section 26, Article II, of the Constitution; second, that they are laws conferring corporate power by special act, in violation of Section 1, Article XIII, of the Constitution.

The conclusions we have reached on the first of these grounds make it unnecessary to consider the second. Section 26 of Article II provides, in part:

“All laws, of a general…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cline v. MartinOhio Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Dayton Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 44 v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Put-In-Bay Island Taxing District Authority v. Colonial, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Board of Trustees, Nprt. Pub. Lib. v. City of Nprt.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  4. State Ex Rel. Brickell v. FrankOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Eighth & Walnut Corp. v. Public LibraryOhio Court of Appeals · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API