Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Accounting of Hiscox

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1909PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by Everett S. Hiscox and another, as executors,, etc., from a decree bf the Surrogate’s Court of the county of Suffolk, entered in said Surrogate’s Court on the 2d day of April, 1909, directing the said executors to amend their account.

1Opinion of the Court

Burr, J.:

David Hiscox died January 25, 1906. He left a. will dated October 6,1905, and proved March 19, 1906. • On the same day his sons, Everett S. Hiscox and Jesse F. Hiscox,. qualified as executors. At the time of his death he was engaged in the business of the manufacture and sale of proprietary medicines .and toilet articles. By his will he provided, among other things, as follows : “ I.appoint my two sons, Everett S. Hiscox and Jesse F. Hiscox, as my executors, to carry on the business now conducted by me under the name of the Hiscox Chemical "Works, and to continue and conduct said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. von Au v. MagenheimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gugel v. . HiscoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Gugel v. HiscoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API