von Au v. Magenheimer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Louis Magenheimer and another, from a judgment of the Supi-eme Court in favor of the plaintiff, and. against the said defendants, the complaint having been dismissed during the trial as to the defendant Noval, which judgment was entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 17th day of March, 1905, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on, the 22d day of March, 1905, denying the said…
Read the full summary
Appeal by the defendants, Louis Magenheimer and another, from a judgment of the Supi-eme Court in favor of the plaintiff, and. against the said defendants, the complaint having been dismissed during the trial as to the defendant Noval, which judgment was entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 17th day of March, 1905, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on, the 22d day of March, 1905, denying the said defendants’ motion for a new trial made upon the minutes, except so much of said order as denies the plaintiff’s motion for…
1Opinion of the Court
Rich, J.:
This is an' action to recover damages claimed to have been sustained in consecpience of false representations and deceit, alleged to have been practiced by the appellants upon the plaintiff, inducing her, as the committee of her incompetent husband, to sell to others 483 shares of the capital stock of the Mason, Au and Magenheimer Confectionery Mannfácturing Company, owned by the incompetent, for the sum of $50,000. The capital stock of the corporation was divided into 1,500-shares of the par value of $100 each. The balance sheet of the corporation of July 1,-1899, which as to…
2Cited by19 opinions
- von Au v. MagenheimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Blake v. Blake Agency, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of SilkmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- In re the Appraisal of the Estate of BallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- In re the Transfer Tax upon the Estate of DupignacNew York Surrogate's Court · 1924
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.