State ex rel. Anderson v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
I
This court has consistently held that a writ of mandamus will lie only *172where there has been a showing that relator has a clear legal right to the relief prayed for, a clear duty to perform the requested act, and that relator has no plain and adequate remedy at law. State, ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc., v. Bacon (1980), 61 Ohio St. 3d 42 [15 O.O.3d 53], paragraph one of the syllabus. The second action in mandamus, now being appealed, sought to compel the commission to comply with the writ previously issued by finding appellant permanently and totally disabled. This very specific request…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State ex rel. Teece v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc. v. BaconOhio Supreme Court · 1980
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cleveland v. BrightOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Copley Township Board of Trustees v. W.J. Horvath Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State ex rel. Clark v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Bowling v. BowlingOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Copley Township Board of Trustees v. W.J. Horvath Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.