Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Tulley v. City of Jacksonville

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 3, 2014No. CR-11-1880Published

1ConcurrenceJoiner, Judge

I concur fully in the main opinion. I write separately to address certain issues raised in the dissenting opinion and to note that I believe the current version of § 13A-11-52, Ala.Code 1975, is unconstitutional.

I

I agree with the main opinion’s conclusion that whether City of Jacksonville Ordinance No. 0-514-10 adequately adopts or incorporates § 13A-11-52, Ala.Code 1975, is a nonjurisdictional question. I cannot reconcile the dissenting opinion’s conclusion to the contrary with our case-law, particularly Ex parte Maxwell, 439 So.2d 715 (Ala.1983), and, most recently, Bailey v. City of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. James C. DunkelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Ex Parte SeymourSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  4. Ex Parte MaxwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Cooper v. Town of Valley HeadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API