Tulley v. City of Jacksonville
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1ConcurrenceJoiner, Judge
I concur fully in the main opinion. I write separately to address certain issues raised in the dissenting opinion and to note that I believe the current version of § 13A-11-52, Ala.Code 1975, is unconstitutional.
I
I agree with the main opinion’s conclusion that whether City of Jacksonville Ordinance No. 0-514-10 adequately adopts or incorporates § 13A-11-52, Ala.Code 1975, is a nonjurisdictional question. I cannot reconcile the dissenting opinion’s conclusion to the contrary with our case-law, particularly Ex parte Maxwell, 439 So.2d 715 (Ala.1983), and, most recently, Bailey v. City of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. James C. DunkelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Ex Parte SeymourSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Ex Parte MaxwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Cooper v. Town of Valley HeadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.