Robertson v. Robertson
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 96 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL FROM HART CIRCUIT COURT. 1. The circuit clerk had no authority to issue the order of arrest under section 2124, Kentucky Statutes, unless the bond required by section 154 of the Civil Code was first executed, and the order was for that reason void.
Read the full summary
Case 96 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL FROM HART CIRCUIT COURT. 1. The circuit clerk had no authority to issue the order of arrest under section 2124, Kentucky Statutes, unless the bond required by section 154 of the Civil Code was first executed, and the order was for that reason void. (Secs. 152, 153, 154, 177 and 194 of Civil Code; Pauer v. Simon, 6 Bush, 514; Kline v. Nie, 88 Ky., 542.) 2. The orders to which the wife is entitled under section 2124 of Kentucky Statutes, are such only as are had in proceedings after judgment. No other construction of that section will harmonize its provisions…
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Lewis
Eliza J. Robertson brought this action against William Robertson .for divorce and alimony.
She states in her petition that they were married in 1.895, and lived together as husband and wife until about January 8, 1896, when, without fault on her part, he abandoned and has since lived separate and apart from her, and failed and refused to contribute to her maintenance and support.
She further states that prior to leaving her, he pretending a desire and intention to purchase a home elsewhere, induced her to join him in selling and conveying all their real estate; that he also sold all their…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Drury v. FrankeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Falls Branch Coal Co. v. Proctor Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Western & Southern Life Insurance v. WeberCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Sparks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Frye's Guardian v. Gamble Bros.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.