Legal Opinion

Mills v. Winter

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1884No. 11,263PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Black, C.

The appellee, Martha Winter, sued Louisa Stringer and the appellants, Henry D. Stringer and William Mills, and obtained judgment against the appellants. Said Mills alone assigns as errors the overruling of his demurrer to the complaint, the overruling of his motion for a new trial, and the overruling of his motion in arrest of judgment.

The demurrer stated as causes, defect of parties plaintiffs, in that James Winter was a necessary plaintiff; defect of parties defendants, in that he was a necessary defendant, and want of sufficient facts.

The complaint charged that the defendants, by…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Carthage Turnpike Co. v. AndrewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Burkhart v. GladishIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Ervin v. State ex rel. WalleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Stockwell v. BrantIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API