Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Olympic Pharmacy

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 20, 1956No. Civ. No. 21709PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff in an action in ejectment, wherein it was decreed that: (1) plaintiff was entitled to immediate possession of the property leased by the plaintiff, as lessor, to defendants, as lessee, for a term of years starting December 10, 1948; (2) plaintiff was entitled to a forfeiture of the lease, and (3) plaintiff was entitled to recover from the defendants as damages for the use and occupation of the property the sum of $11,053.76, together with attorney’s fees and costs.

Upon entry of judgment the defendants filed a written petition…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Miller & Lux Inc. v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Travis Glass Co. v. IbbetsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Palo and Dodini v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lines v. Marin Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API