Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Miller

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 11, 1956No. 5-992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sam RobiNsoet, Associate Justice.

The issue here is whether an instrument which, on its face, purports to he a deed, is in fact a mortgage. Appellees, I. 0. Miller and Helen M. Miller, own a home in Fayetteville which was mortgaged to a building and loan association. In 1941, the mortgage was foreclosed and the property sold at the foreclosure sale to a Mr. Parks. H. 0. Davis was a friend and neighbor of the Millers; after having seen an account of the sale in a local newspaper, he called on the Millers and offered his assistance in saving their home for them; of course, this was agreeable to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hays v. EmersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  2. Kerby v. FieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. Snell v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  4. Wimberly v. ScogginSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  5. Clark-Mcwilliams Coal Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Duvall v. Laws, Swain & Murdoch, P.A.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Atlas Motor Inns, Inc. v. All American Holding Corp. (In re All American Holding Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1981
  3. Duvall v. Laws, Swain & Murdoch, P.A.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API