Legal Opinion
Duvall v. Laws, Swain & Murdoch, P.A.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Decided October 24, 1990No. CA 89-484Published
1Opinion of the Court
797 S.W.2d 474 (1990)
32 Ark.App. 99
Fred E. DUVALL, et ux, Appellant,
v.
LAWS, SWAIN, & MURDOCH, P.A., Ike Allen Laws, Jr., and Revere Corporation, Appellees.
No. CA 89-484.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas, En Banc.
October 24, 1990.
Richard L. Peel, Peel and Eddy by James S. Dunham, Russellville, for appellant.
Ike Allen Laws, Jr., pro se.
James M. Moody, Little Rock, for appellees.
JENNINGS, Judge.
In 1982, appellant Fred Duvall was charged with theft in connection with the buying and selling of oil and gas leases. He asked Ike Allen Laws, Jr., the appellee, a Russellville lawyer, to represent him. The…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Thweatt v. FreemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Matthews v. StevensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Newport v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Clark-Mcwilliams Coal Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- Swaim v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.