People v. Crandall
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*852OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
While the risk of a coerced verdict is to be carefully avoided, we cannot conclude that the Appellate Division erred when it affirmed the jury’s verdict of guilt in this case. It is true that under the Trial Judge’s instructions this jury was held until the verdict was rendered at 3:27 a.m. — following an afternoon and evening of deliberation after a two-day, second trial. There is nothing in the record, however, to demonstrate fatigue or other distress on the part of the jurors at the time of their note at…
2Cited by13 opinions
- State v. GarrettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- In re Nichole L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. CarrollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. MaddoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- In re Jason FF.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.