Combs v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
.VAIDIK, Judge,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I agree with the majority that the war-rantless search of the car was proper. However, I part ways with the majority's analysis and conclusion on the inappropriate sentence issue. I therefore concur in part and dissent in part.
The jury found Combs guilty of Class C felony possession of methamphetamine, Class A misdemeanor possession of paraphernalia, and Class A misdemeanor car*1064rying a handgun without a license. The trial court identified as aggravators that Combs violated the conditions of his release on bond in the instant case by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Childress v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Lewis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Johnson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.