Johnson v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, Judge.
Case Summary
Euranus Johnson appeals his conviction for criminal deviate conduct and his sentence for that and several other convictions related to the rape of a woman. We find that there is sufficient evidence to support Johnson's conviction for criminal deviate conduct, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Johnson to the maximum term for all of his convictions and in ordering all of his sentences to run consecutively, and that Johnson's sentence is not inappropriate. Therefore, we affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
On January 7, 2003, at…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Cotto v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Wooley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Sensback v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Ellis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Boggs v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Shawn Lawrence Corbally v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Stokes v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Harold E. Chastain v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Perry v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.