Legal Opinion

Estate of Kearney

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1910No. Civ. No. 768PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal is from a decree of partial distribution, and is brought here on what is termed the judgment-roll without a bill of exceptions. In such case all presumptions are in favor of the regularity of the judgment and decree of the trial court.

The record contains the will of deceased filed in the clerk's office in May, 1906. By its provisions the entire estate is left to the Regents of the University of California, a corporation. It is further provided therein that the deceased did not desire that any portion of his estate should go to his heirs, if any heirs should survive him; and that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Abila v. PadillaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Johnson v. TysonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Estate of AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Mead v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  3. In Re Estate of LevyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. McKee v. BuckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. KirkwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API