Legal Opinion

Rolens v. City of Hutchinson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 10, 1910No. 17,344PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Reno district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment refusing to grant a temporary injunction against the city of Hutchinson, in which suit the. court was *619asked to restrain the city from the construction of an open drainage ditch across the appellants’ lands. The appellants are the grantees of A. J. Malick, who owned a small tract of land in the city of Hutchinson, across which Cow creek, a tortuous stream carrying considerable water, flows. On the west side of appellants’ lands a drainage canal had been built by the city for the purpose of carrying off…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Winslow v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Allen v. San José Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Burnham v. NevinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  4. Poirier v. FetterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  5. Gray v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coulsen v. Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Eugene C. Walsh and Lois M. Walsh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. Sullivan v. City of GoodlandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  4. Latham v. GarnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Latham v. GarnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API