Legal Opinion

Rosario v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 22, 2011No. Case No. 10 C 1512PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

JOAN B. GOTTSCHALL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs George Rosario, Eusebio Razo, Ervin P. Ternoir, James M. Gavin, Jacqueline Healy, William Andino, Kevin Graham, Thomas Kolmar, and Kevin Finnegan, all current and former Chicago police officers, filed this lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on behalf of themselves and a class of similarly situated individuals. The plaintiffs allege that the Retirement Board of the Policemen’s Annuity and Benefit Fund of the City of Chicago (“Board”) denied plaintiffs certain pension benefits in violation of their rights under the Equal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Tamayo v. BlagojevichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Betty J. Archie v. City of Racine, Ronald W. Chiapete, and George W. GieseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Taylor v. The Retirement Board of The Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of The City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API