Legal Opinion · Dissent

Douglas Craig Lemley v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 2016No. S-15-0225Published

1DissentFox, Justice

[¶ 84] I respectfully dissent, The majority concludes Mr. Lemley was not prejudiced by trial counsel's failure to file a motion to suppress evidence found during the search of Mr., Lemley's backpack because the search was lawful under the doctrine of apparent *768authority. According to the majority, the investigating officer reasonably determined that Mr. Keele had apparent authority to consent to a search of Mr. Lemley's backpack. I disagree. The majority reaches its conclusion despite the fact that the record shows the officer (1) did not know who the backpack belonged to before searching the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. JamesIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  2. O'BOYLE v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  3. United States v. KimoanaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. LangstonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. CosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API