Legal Opinion

Hayward v. Clay

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 29, 1978No. 77-2028PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUTZNER, Circuit Judge:

The questions for decision are whether a South Carolina statute conditioning the holding of an annexation election upon a majority vote by the freeholders in the area to be annexed violates the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution, and whether the challenged portions of the statute are severable from the remainder. The district court found the challenged provisions unconstitutional and severable. We affirm.

I

As one of several methods of annexation, the South Carolina Code provides that proceedings may be initiated by a petition signed by 15 percent of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gomillion v. LightfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Cipriano v. City of HoumaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. City of Phoenix v. KolodziejskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. City of Herriman v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  2. City of Seattle v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Barefoot v. City of WilmingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
  4. Berry v. BourneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
  5. Moorman v. WoodDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API