Pratt v. Prodata, Inc.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZIMMERMAN, Chief Justice:
Defendants Will McCoy and Prodata, Inc., appeal from a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff John Pratt. The jury found that defendants intentionally interfered with Pratt’s prospective economic relations with the Utah Department of Transportation (“UDOT”). On appeal, defendants contend that (i) several of the jury’s findings are not supported by sufficient evidence; (ii) the jury’s finding on proximate cause is unsound as a matter of law; and (iii) a judgment for intentional interference with economic relations cannot be based on the transmission of truthful…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Top Service Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Leigh Furniture and Carpet Co. v. IsomUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Eldridge v. JohndrowUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- Tiernan v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Anderson Development Co. v. TobiasUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- Billings v. Union Bankers Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
- Walnut Street Associates, Inc. v. Brokerage Concepts, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.