Legal Opinion
De La Cruz v. Colon-Rondon
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided July 8, 2013No. Civil No. 12-1837 (JAF)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JOSE ANTONIO FUSTE, District Judge.
On April 12, 2013, we entered an opinion and order, (Docket No. 57, 946 F.Supp.2d 244, 2013 WL 1531649 (D.P.R.2013)), granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss under Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1).1 (Docket No. 10.) We found that neither the writ of mandamus statute, nor § 1983, nor § 667 confers subject-matter jurisdiction over this case. (Docket No. 57.) We ordered the parties to brief the question whether Ex Parte Young, 209 U.S. 123, 159-60, 28 S.Ct. 441, 52 L.Ed. 714 (1908), confers jurisdiction. (Id.) We also ordered…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Murphy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Marshall v. MarshallDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022