Legal Opinion

Badger v. Suthers

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 30, 1999No. 99SA64PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bender

On August 19, 1998, the petitioner, Chris Badger, filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Fremont County District Court, claiming that he was entitled to be paroled on July 31, 1998 and that the Department of Corrections (DOC) was illegally refusing to release him. See § 13-45-101, 5 C.R.S. (1998). The district court denied the petition without holding a hearing, concluding that, “[at] most, Petitioner is eligible for discretionary parole. He is not entitled to release or discharge.” Badger then filed this appeal from the denial of his petition. See § 13-4-102(l)(e), 5 C.R.S.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thiret v. KautzkySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. Vaughn v. GunterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. Spoto v. Colorado State Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  4. Brant v. FielderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Martin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. Nowak v. SuthersSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  3. Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections v. FetzerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  4. People v. HallColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Ankeney v. Raemisch, Exec. Dir., Colorado Dep't of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API