Nowak v. Suthers
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hood
T1 In this habeas corpus appeal, we consider whether section 17-22.5-101, C.R.S. (2018), requires the Colorado Department of Corrections ("DOC") to construe an inmate's sentences as one continuous sentence in determining his parole eligibility date ("PED"), when the second sentence is not imposed until after the PED for the first sentence has passed, and when doing so would result in the inmate becoming parole eligible before serving at least 50% of the second sentence. To resolve this question, we evaluate for the first time the relationship between section 17-22.5-101 and section…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Charnes v. BoomSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- People v. LutherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- People v. MaddenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Goedecke v. State, Dept. of InstitutionsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- Kodama v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Coffman, Colorado Attorney General v. Williamson, JrSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
- Diehl v. WeiserSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- Jones v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- McGihon v. CaveColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- v. Zag Built LLC —Colorado Court of Appeals · 2018
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.