Forelander v. Hicks
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Johnson Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtStuart, J.
This is a petition, seemingly in the nature of a proceeding in chancery, to set aside a sheriff’s sale. Decree according to the prayer of the petition.
The proceeding was had in 1852, while the old practice was still in force. What would have been its fate on demurrer, or on motion in arrest of judgment, is not now a question. These tests of its sufficiency were not applied. Though the language of the petition, “ your orator,” &c., indicates in the mind of the pleader a bill in chancery, it may perhaps be better designated as a proceeding by notice and motion. ,
It appears that Forelander…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- The Mayor and Commonalty of Alexandria v. Patten and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1808
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States, Ex Rel. v. C., O. G. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Hunt v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Board of Commissioners v. VerbargIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- United States ex rel. Search v. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Stuart v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.