Legal Opinion
Hairston v. Pacific-10 Conference
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided May 20, 1994No. C93-1763RPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
ROTHSTEIN, Chief Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the court on a motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) by defendant Pacific 10 Conference to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint. Having reviewed the motion together with all documents filed in support and in opposition, and being fully advised, the court finds and rules as follows:
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs in this case are five student athletes (“the players”) on the football team at the University of Washington (“UW”), two football souvenir sellers who have licensing agreements with…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Knelman v. Middlebury CollegeDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2012
- Hairston v. Pacific 10 ConferenceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Schilling v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
- Hall v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Hairston v. Pacific 10 ConferenceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.