State v. Watson
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Quinn-Brintnall, A.C.J.
— Charles Watson appeals his standard range sentence for delivery of a controlled sub*525stance on the grounds that the trial court failed to grant an evidentiary hearing on disputed facts, failed to follow statutory sentencing procedures, and violated his equal protection and due process rights when it denied his request that he be sentenced under the Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA).
We hold that the prosecutor’s memoranda improperly conveyed the prosecutor’s DOSA sentencing policy to all Pierce County superior court judges. But because the State’s sentencing…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State of Washington v. Scott Michael WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Brian Byrd v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- State Of Washington v. Sebastian J. HallerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.