Legal Opinion

Malone v. Benson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1985No. 84-193, 84-265, 84-266, 84-267, 84-268, 84-269, 84-270, 84-271, 84-272PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKrivosha, C.J.

Each of these consolidated appeals presents to the court once again questions concerning the proper interpretation of Nebraska “good time” laws. See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 83-1,107, 83-1,107.01, and 83-1,123 (Reissue 1981). Specifically, the questions presented are: (1) Upon revocation of an offender’s parole, is all of the offender’s good time automatically forfeited as a result of such revocation? and (2) If revoked, can such good time ever be restored?

The cases involved herein began in two different ways. Case No. 84-193 (Malone) began as a habeas corpus action but was later amended to seek…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HavorkaNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Van Patten v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  3. State v. BlackNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Lytle v. VitekNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Riker v. VitekNebraska Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hoiengs v. County of AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Wounded Shield v. GunterNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Craig v. Hastings State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Smith v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API