Legal Opinion

Van Patten v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1959No. 34388PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

This is an action in condemnation brought by the city of Omaha. Wilbur L. and Phyllis L. Van Patten were the owners of the property when the proceedings began. The appeal here involves the correctness of a summary judgment granted by the trial court holding that the proceedings in condemnation were null and void. The city appeals.

This cause was argued and submitted to the court on June 4, 1958. On July 2, 1958, we set the cause down for reargument. We requested briefs on the question of the applicability of section 14-366, R. S. Supp., 1957, to the issue presented, and whether or not the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ledwith v. Bankers Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State ex rel. Nelson v. ButlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Omaha Parking Authority v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Nagle v. City of Grand IslandNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Papke v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Carroll Weir Funeral Home, Inc. v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Transcanada Keystone Pipeline, LP v. Dunavan (In Re Application No. Op-0003)Nebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. DivisNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ChaulkNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. BlackNebraska Supreme Court · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API