Wheeler v. City of Maryville
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
McAMIS J.
Mrs. Barsha Wheeler instituted this suit against the City of Maryville to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when she fell on a sidewalk. The trial court sustained the City’s motion for a directed verdict at the conclusioAi of all the evidence based upon its insistence that the evidence failed to establish a case of liability “under the law and the evidence.” The plaintiff appeals in error.
While the motion for peremptory instructions, as seen from the language above quoted, is based upon the asserted insufficiency of the proof to make out a case “.under,.the. law and the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Osborn v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1945
- City of Nashville v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
- O'Brien v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- City of Birmingham v. MonetteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- American Trust & Banking Co. v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Morris v. BollingCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
- Harrison v. Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
- Brown v. City of ManchesterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ElamTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
- Leonard v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.