Legal Opinion

Doyle v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 29, 1941No. 10045PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

The suit was for the title and possession of a tract of 2.71 acres of land, described, in the petition, by metes and bounds, and, as bisected by the common boundary line between two adjoining tracts, one owned by one of the plaintiffs, the other by the other two. There was a motion to dismiss, a plea of mis-joinder of parties-plaintiffs, because the petition showed not joint but several ownerships, and a motion for more definite statement or for bill of particulars. These, overruled, there was an answer and cross action in effect denying plaintiffs’, and asserting…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rio Bravo Oil Co. v. WeedTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Cantley v. Gulf Production Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Shell Petroleum Corporation v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  4. Woods v. Selby Oil & Gas Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  5. Zeppa v. Houston Oil Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Har-Pen Truck Lines, Inc. v. Frederick Allen Mills, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. Woodson Oil Company v. PruettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  3. Sun-X Glass Tinting of Mid-Wisconsin, Inc. v. Sun-X International, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1964
  4. Davis v. Dallas County, Tex.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2008
  5. Pocahontas Land Corp. v. EvansWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API