O. H. Broun, Jr., Timber Co. v. Coleman
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Mobile Law and Equity Court. Heard before Hon. Saffold Berney. Assumpsit by James L. Coleman against the O. H. Broun, Jr., Timber Company, a-partnership, consisting of O. H. Broun and G. T. Loper. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant Loper alone appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
Suit upon promissory note signed: “O. H. Bronn, Jr.” The suit was begun by garnishment. The garnishment affidavit set ont the name of each defendant as O. H. Broun, Jr., Timber Company, and 01-ney H. Broun and G. T. Loper, and so also does the bond. The two garnishment writs each show the same, and each contains the further recitation that the O. H. Broun, Jr., Timber Company is a partnership composed of Olney H. Broun, Jr., and G. T. Loper. The complaint seems .to be without a caption, and does not name the defendants. There was a formal appearance duly filed by counsel for “all of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cain Lumber Co. v. Standard Dry Kiln Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Greer & Walker v. Liipfert-Scales Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Palmer & Co. v. Scott & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Goetter, Weil & Co. v. Head & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1881
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vaughn v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Lusk v. BrittonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916