Marcella M. Gettins v. United States Life Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1DissentMiller, Circuit Judge
I am of the opinion that under the rule of Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188, this case is controlled by the ruling of the Ohio Supreme Court in John Hancock Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Luzio, 123 Ohio St. 616, 176 N.E. 446, 447. The applicable law established by that case, using the syllabus rule in effect in Ohio, is contained in Paragraph 4 of the syllabus reading as follows:
“One who is employed as soliciting agent, whose sole authority is to solicit insurance and to report to his principal the information which the applicant has given him, cannot, without proof…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- John Hancock Mutual Life Ins. v. LuzioOhio Supreme Court · 1931
- Bellak v. United Home Life Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
- Peponis v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1942