Legal Opinion

United States v. Glidden Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 29, 1935No. 6887PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

The appellant brought a civil suit to recover upwards of $2,000,000 as taxes and interest under subdivision 4, of section 900, of the Revenue Act of 1926 (26 USCA § 245 (4), for the diversion by the appellees of denatured alcohol to beverage purposes, in violation of the terms of permits issued to them under title 3,' of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA § 71 et seq.). The appellees, defendants below, asserted a number of defenses, to six of which the appellant demurred upon the ground that each upon its face was insufficient in law. The demurrers being overruled…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brewster v. GageSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. United States v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. United States v. RabinowichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. United States v. La FrancaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Lipke v. LedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Younge v. State Board of Registration for Healing ArtsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  2. United States v. Glidden Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  3. United States v. Hospital Monteflores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. BornnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  5. United States v. United States Industrial Alcohol Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API