Legal Opinion
People v. Martin
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 24, 2005No. B175517PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COFFEE, J.
Michael Anthony Martin appeals from an order of the superior court committing him to the State Department of Mental Health (DMH) for treatment as a mentally disordered offender (MDO). (Pen. Code, §§ 2962, 2966.)1 He argues that he did not qualify as an MDO because he did not *973receive at least 90 days of mental health treatment during the year preceding his parole release date and that his underlying offense was not a crime of force or violence. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant has a long history of mental illness, which includes auditory hallucinations and delusions among its…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Shawn Garfield Price v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. CoddingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. CamposCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. DoddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- People v. KORTESMAKICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. AchremCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- May v. HunterDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.