Legal Opinion

Stidhams v. McPherson

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided November 26, 1969No. 692-AppealPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Almost seventy-five years ago this Court decided that a party by submitting to a decision against himself in the District Court was not thereby precluded from appealing that decision to the Common Pleas Division of this Court, where in appropriate circumstances he was entitled to a jury trial and in all events to a trial de novo. Lavelle v. Kimball, 18 R. I. 786, 31 A. 166 (1895). The creation of the Superior Court in 1905 and its succession to the jurisdiction formerly exercised by the Common Pleas Division did not alter the Lavelle rule. Dorney v. Ives, 36 R. I. 276, 90 A. 164 (1914). And…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Providence v. HallSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1928
  2. Dorney v. IvesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1914
  3. Lavelle v. KimballSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chernov Enterprises, Inc. v. ScuncioSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
  2. Trice v. City of CranstonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
  3. Federal National Mortgage Association v. Etta E. MalinouSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2014
  4. Harris v. TurchettaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
  5. State v. PerrySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API