Legal Opinion
State v. McNally
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided October 14, 1982No. 81-424PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The issue in this case is whether a defendant who has been convicted of larceny in Massachusetts may subsequently be prosecuted in New Hampshire under RSA 637:7 for retaining the same property which he stole in Massachusetts. We hold that New Hampshire is not barred from prosecuting the defendant.
On June 12, 1981, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts charged the defendant, Michael McNally, with larceny of air-carbide bits in violation of Massachusetts General Laws Annotated chapter 266, section 30 (West 1970). The defendant pleaded guilty to the charge on August 12, 1981, in district court at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Abbate v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Milanovich v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- State v. HoggSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- State v. GosselinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- State v. HeinzSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. ChaissonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Heald v. PerrinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- State v. MacLeodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- State v. EdwardsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- In re Toyota AvalonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007