Legal Opinion
State v. Hogg
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 25, 1978No. 7923PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, J.
The issue in this bank robbery case is whether acquittal in the federal court bars prosecution by the State when the charges against both defendants arose out of the same criminal transaction.
On February 20,1976, a federally insured bank in Colebrook, New Hampshire, was robbed. Defendant Hogg was charged in federal court with robbery and defendant Simpson with being an accessory before the fact. Hogg was found not guilty by a jury in the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire. After two trials resulting in hung juries, a judgment of acquittal was entered for Simpson.
Fol…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Carson v. MaurerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. SandsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- State v. LaurieSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.