Hartsell v. Hickman
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN E. MILLER, District Judge.
This case is before the Court upon plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in his favor and upon defendant’s motion for summary judgment in his favor. Each party contends that there is no material issue of fact and that he is entitled to summary judgment in his favor as a matter of law.
The question presented to the Court is whether there is any genuine issue as to any material fact within the meaning of Rule 56, Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C.A. and whether either party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. In Marion County Co-Op Ass’n v. Carnation Co.,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kruzie v. SandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Marion County Co-Op. Ass'n v. Carnation Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1953
- Brand v. RorkeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
- McMahon v. DekraaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
- Derrick v. RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Northrip v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Greene v. MorseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
- Bullington v. Farmer's Tractor & Implement Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
- Mrs. Ruth Frisby, Administratrix of the Estate of Roy L. Frisby, Deceased v. Olin Mathieson Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Goodman v. McCulleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.