Legal Opinion

Washington Mutual Bank v. Coughlin

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 13, 2016No. AC37645PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.

*280 The defendants Linda S. Coughlin and Daniel F. Coughlin 1 appeal from the judgment of strict foreclosure rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association. 2 The defendants' sole claim on appeal 3 is that the court improperly denied their motion to dismiss, filed on the eve of trial. In that motion, they argued that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction due to the original plaintiff's purported failure to comply with the notice *281 requirement set forth in General Statutes § 8-265ee (a), 4 which is part of the Emergency Mortgage Assistance…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. ReaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Patino v. Birken Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  3. Rafalko v. University of New HavenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  4. Brown v. OtakeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  5. Penn v. IrizarrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Aurora Loan Services, LLC v. CondronConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  2. 307 White Street Realty, LLC v. Beaver Brook Group, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
  3. Pennymac Corp. v. TarziaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
  4. Pettiford v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  5. Linda S CoughlinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API