Legal Opinion

Pettiford v. State

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 16, 2018No. AC39296PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.

In this action arising out of a motor vehicle collision with a pedestrian, the plaintiff Michael Pettiford appeals, following a trial to the court, from the judgment rendered in favor of the defendant, the state of Connecticut. 1 The court concluded that the plaintiff was "at least" 60 percent contributorily negligent for his injuries and, thus, was barred from recovering damages on the basis of the defendant's negligence in accordance with General Statutes § 52-572h(b). 2 The plaintiff claims on appeal that he is entitled to a new trial because the court's comparative negligence calculus…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Crews v. CrewsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. Lopa v. Brinker International, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  4. Vincent v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  5. In Re Jose B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API