United States v. Morris
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*756Opinion of the Court
Robert E. Quinn, Chief Judge:
Upon reviewing the evidence pertaining to one of the two offenses of which the accused was convicted, the staff judge advocate advised the convening authority as follows: “There is sufficient evidence in the record to sustain the findings of guilty of wrongful possession of marihuana, and in the absence of an indication of a manifest injustice, these findings should be approved.” The standard prescribed is not that by which the convening authority must measure his review. United States v Grice, 8 USCMA 166, 23 CMR 390; United States v Johnson,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. GriceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. SulewskiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. RobinsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1975
- United States v. HinesU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1975
- United States v. NelsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
- United States v. ColemanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.