Hamerski v. Belleville Area Special Servs. Coop.
District Court, S.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
HERNDON, District Judge:
I. Introduction
Now before the Court is defendant, Belleville Area Special Services Cooperative's (hereinafter "BASSC"), motion for summary judgment pursuant to FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 56 (Doc. 34). Plaintiff Ruth Hamerski (hereinafter "Hamerski"), opposes the motion (Docs. 36). For the reasons explained below, the Court grants in part and denies in part BASSC's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 34).
II. Background
Plaintiff Hamerski began her employment with BASSC on July 1, 2007, as an administrator for instructional programs (Doc. 37-1). At that time, she had…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Boykin v. Illinois Department of Juvenile JusticeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025