Legal Opinion
First National Bank in Oklahoma City v. Duncan
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 25, 1927No. 17638PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ITERK, C.
The plaintiff in error will be referred to as defendant and the defendant in error as plaintiff, as the parties appeared in the trial court.
The plaintiff, for cause of action against the defendant, alleges the following state of facts: That on and for a long time prior to February 2, 1925. the plaintiff had been shipping cattle and hogs and clearing his business through the National Dive Stock Commission Company, and drafts covering purchase price of live stock would be -drawn by plaintiff on said National Dive Stock Commission Company, and cattle and hogs so purchased were shipped…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Union Stock Yards Bank v. GillespieSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Cady v. South Omaha National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Steere v. Stockyards National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Burtnett v. First National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Clemmer v. Drovers' National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dresser v. DresserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Brown v. Maguire's Real Estate AgencySupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
- DEPOSIT GUAR. NAT. BK. v. BN Simrall & SonMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Fidelity Nat. Bank of Oklahoma City v. CopelandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Blackwell Livestock Auction, Inc. v. Community Bank of ShidlerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.