Legal Opinion

Burtnett v. First National Bank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1878PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Error to Shiawassee. Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

This action, was brought by William Burtnett in his life-time to recover a little over a thousand dollars claimed to have been received by the bank upon a bond issued by the city of Corunna and by him owned. In the progress of the cause he died and his administrator was allowed to assume the further direction of proceedings.

Upon the trial the jury found for the bank and the case has been removed to this court in order to obtain a review of particular rulings made in the circuit court.

The plaintiff in error has been fully heard but we have not been favored with either argument or brief on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cook v. TullisSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Van Alen v. . American National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Clark v. IselinSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Haddow v. . LundyNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  5. Broderick v. Waltham Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Mancuso v. United Bank of PuebloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. Cady v. South Omaha National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Smith v. Des Moines National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  4. National Indemnity Co. v. Spring Branch State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Gillen v. Wakefield State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API