Legal Opinion

Graham v. Boynton

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1872PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Busk. Tried below before the Hon. J. B. Williamson. A clear statement of the facts is given in the opinion of the court. The record of the suit of McKleroy & Bradford against Dunn, Tates & Bichie was introduced in evidence by the plaintiff in the present case. It showed that answers for Dunn, Yates & Bichie were duly filed by attorneys. The appellee Boynton was a tenant of H. M. Cushman, who came in as a co-defendant, and who is one of the appellees.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

This is an action of trespass to try-title, brought by the appellant against the appellees, in the district court for the county of Rusk, at the October term, 1870.

The question for our determination is as to the validity of a sheriff’s deed, through which the appellant claims title.

*718The property in controversy is a house and lot in Henderson. The case was tried by the court, a jury having been waived. The facts from which we are to «determine the law of the case are substantially these : McKleroy & Bradford, partners doing business in the city of New Orleans, sued the firm of Dunn &

Yates, at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex parte FosterU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1842
  2. In re BellowsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire · 1844
  3. Pancost v. Corporation of WashingtonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · 1838

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rogers v. BurbridgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API